Mayberry v. Leech, Harrison & Forwood
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from Circuit Court of Mobile. Tried before Hon. H. T. Toulmin. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the CourtManning, J.
Appellees, merchants of Liverpool, England, sued appellants as executors of D. O. Grady, deceased, for ¿6539 3s. 6d. alleged to be due as the balance of an account, on the 31st December, 1871. One of the pleas of defendant, in short, was : “Off set of the sum of nine hundred and eighty pounds sterling, monies collected for insurance of cotton, shipped by the steamer “ Ithine,” and lost and not paid to D. O. Grady, nor credited for to him or his legal representatives.”
In respect to this, the cotton was insured for ¿62,600, of which ¿62,135 7s. 4d. were accounted for to D. O. Grady. The vessel…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Syndicate Insurance v. CatchingsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Craft v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Phœnix Insurance v. MoogSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
- Grisham v. BodmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Rice v. Schloss & KahnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.