Legal Opinion
Aldawoody v. Candela Corporation
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided August 27, 2025No. 2:25-cv-12695Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE ZACK ALDAWOODY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) 2:25-cv-00308-SDN ) CANDELA CORPORATION, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER TO CHANGE VENUE On August 12, 2025, I ordered Plaintiff Zack Aldawoody to show cause why this matter should not be transferred to the Eastern District of Michigan pursuant to
28 U.S.C. §§ 1404, 1406. ECF No. 10. For the purposes of venue, “an entity with the capacity to sue and be sued in its common name under applicable law, whether or not incorporated, shall be deemed to reside, if a defendant, in any judicial district in which such defendant…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Jay A. Pritzker v. Bob YariCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Chen v. US Sports Academy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
- Britell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.