Legal Opinion

Santiago v. Kelly

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 2012Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Barbara Jaffe, J.

By amended notice of petition dated July 13, 2011, petitioner brings this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking a judgment of mandamus compelling respondents to: (1) hold a hearing before the Police Pension Fund (PPF) Medical Board on petitioner’s health problems for the purpose of determining his eligibility for an accidental disability retirement (ADR) pension pursuant to the World Trade Center presumption (Administrative Code of City of NY § 13-252.1) (WTC presumption); or (2) permit petitioner to apply for an ADR pension pursuant to the WTC presumption or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Borenstein v. New York City Employees' Retirement SystemNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. New York Civil Liberties Union v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Medicon Diagnostic Laboratories, Inc. v. PeralesNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Curiale v. Ardra InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Grisi v. ShainswitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API