Legal Opinion
Italiano v. State
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided January 5, 1940PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The plaintiff in error, Joe Italiano, was convicted of maintaining a gaming house and conducting a lottery “known' as Cuba bolita” as charged in the first and second counts of the information, respectively. The jury having designated in their verdict that guilt had been proven under these charges the effect was to find this defendant not guilty under the third count which charged operation of a lottery “known as New York bond.” The plaintiff in error, Sam Italiano, was found guilty under all counts of the information.
It is stated by plaintiffs in error that two questions are involved in the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Haile v. GardnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
- Cortes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
- State ex rel. Stillman v. MerrittSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
- Ellis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Collins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- State v. GustafsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
- Mixon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.