Legal Opinion

With v. Amador

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 13, 1979No. Nos. 77-2028, 77-2029PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Judge.

Appellants filed petitions for bankruptcy with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Mexico. Appellee filed complaints in each of the bankruptcy proceedings for a determination that the bankrupts’ debts to him were nondischargeable under section 17a(2) of the Bankruptcy Act (11 U.S.C. § 35(a)(2))1 and for a judg*430ment against the bankrupts. The Referee in Bankruptcy (hereinafter “Referee”) awarded a nondischargeable judgment in favor of appellee against appellants Roy A. Vaughan and Thomas Amador2 in the amount of $11,955.36 plus interest and attorney’s fees…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Davis v. Aetna Acceptance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. McIntyre v. KavanaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Young v. Higbee Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. In the Matter of Gerald A. Mascolo, BankruptCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In the Matter of Thomas Amador, Bankrupt. Alex With v. Thomas Amador, in the Matter of Roy A. Vaughan A/K/A Roy Alexander Vaughan, Bankrupt. Alex With v. Roy A. Vaughan A/K/A Roy Alexander VaughanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API