Legal Opinion

Martin v. United States

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided January 12, 1966No. Civ. A. 8051PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEMPHILL, District Judge.

Plaintiffs seek recovery of $10,812.90 principal, $1,320.65 interest and $941.00 principal, $58.49 interest, of income tax “illegally and erroneously assessed and collected from plaintiffs, 1 for the calendar years 1958 and 1959, together with interest from the date of payment.” Jurisdiction of this forum is conferred by 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a) (l). 2 Motion for summary judgment has heretofore been denied (August 12, 1965) and counsel given opportunity and direction to explore and present the facts. 3

Contained in the Stipulation of Facts herein are explanatory paragraphs:

7…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. GilmoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Harrison E. Spangler and Myrtle B. Spangler v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  3. United States v. PatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Bowers v. LumpkinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
  5. United States v. General Geophysical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Orlo G. Burch and Marjorie C. Burch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  2. King's Grant Golf Acquisition, LLC Ex Rel. T 2 Green, LLC v. Abercrombie (In Re T 2 Green, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2007
  3. Anderson County v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API