Dundon Capital Partners LLC v. Ebersol
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas
1Opinion
S BANKR is ce Qs 1 Bete IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED and DECREED that the “aie ky .- . below described is SO ORDERED. ac &. Dated: September 25, 2025. Cacy Za CRAIG A. ot CHIEF UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION IN RE: § CASE NO. 19-50900-CAG § LEGENDARY FIELD EXHIBITIONS, § LLC, et al., § § Debtors. § CHAPTER7 DUNDON CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC, § § Plaintiff, § § § Adversary NO. 22-05077-CAG V. § § CHARLES EBERSOL, § § Defendant. § ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S RULE 11 MOTION FOR SANCTIONS (ECE NO. 184). Came on to be considered is Defendant’s Motion for…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Patricia Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Stephen Michael Ridder v. City of Springfield, Clark CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Mary Ann Pensiero, Inc. v. LingleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Reed v. City of ArlingtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.