Legal Opinion

Turco v. Town of Barnstead

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 30, 1992No. 91-127PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBatchelder, J.

The plaintiffs, Salvatore and Helen Turco, appeal from a decision of the Superior Court (Dickson, J.), ruling that the defendant, the Town of Barnstead, was not obligated by the doctrine of municipal estoppel to maintain Garland Road, on which the plaintiffs had built a house. We find that the defendant is estopped from failing to maintain the road, and remand for imposition of an appropriate equitable remedy.

*259In 1959, the plaintiffs acquired a plot of land consisting of about 60 acres in the Town of Barnstead. They vacationed in the seasonal cottage on the land for nearly thirty years, and in…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Parkview Associates v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. United States v. James Gordon LansingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  3. City of Concord v. TompkinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  4. R. A. Vachon & Son, Inc. v. City of ConcordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
  5. Adams v. BradshawSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Healey v. New Durham Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  2. Town of Seabrook v. Vachon ManagementSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
  3. Sunapee Difference, LLC v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
  4. Hanselv. City of KeeneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  5. Appeal of the Somersworth School DistrictSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API