Legal Opinion
Planned Parenthood of South Carolina, Inc. v. Rose
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided December 26, 2002No. 2-01-3571-23PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BERTELSMAN, Senior District Judge. 1
This case arises out of a dispute regarding the constitutionality of a South Carolina statute authorizing the issuance of special motor vehicle license plates bearing the words “Choose Life.”
Before the court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. The court heard oral argument on these motions on November 22, 2002.
The matter having been taken under submission, the court now issues the following opinion addressing the merits of the controversy.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
A. The South Carolina “Choose Life” License Plate Statute.
In 2001,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Planned Parenthood Of South Carolina Incorporated v. B. Boykin RoseCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- Planned Parenthood of South Carolina Inc. v. RoseCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- Henderson v. StalderDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2003
- The Women's Resource Network v. GourleyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2004
- Summers v. AdamsDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.