Legal Opinion · Dissent

Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. Secretary of the United States Department of Health & Human Services

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 26, 2013No. 13-1144Published

1DissentJordan, Circuit Judge

Having previously dissented from the denial of a stay pending appeal in this case, I now have a second opportunity to consider the government’s violation of the religious freedoms of Conestoga Wood Specialties Corporation (“Conestoga”) and its owners, the Hahns, a family of devout Mennonite Christians who believe in the sanctity of human life. The Hahns do not want to be forced to pay for other people to obtain contraceptives and sterilization services, particularly the drugs known as “Plan B” (or the “morning after pill”) and “Ella” (or the “week after pill”), which they view as chemical…

2Cases cited94 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API