Bruni v. Department of Registration & Education
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Dissent
Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE STAMOS
dissenting:
I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion. As I interpret that opinion, it is premised solely upon the assumption that the 1967 amendment to Section 16a (2) of the Medical Practice Act manifested a legislative intent to “make explicit” and “make clear” the terms of that statute. This is an assumption without foundation in fact or in law.
No committee comments accompany the 1967 amendment. We are unaware of the content of any debates which may have preceded its passage. Prior to 1967 no Illinois court had interpreted the phrase “conviction of a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Western National Bank v. Village of KildeerIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
- The People v. BlanchettIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
- Matter of DoneganNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Huckaba v. CoxIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
- State Ex Rel. Olson v. LangerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.