Legal Opinion

Cloar v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 29, 1984PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUDGEL, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered by the Graves Circuit Court. Pursuant to a jury’s verdict, the court adjudged appellant guilty of the offenses of receiving stolen property, terroristic threatening, resisting arrest, and wanton endangerment. On appeal, appellant contends that the court erred (1) by failing to suppress evidence illegally seized from an area within the curtilage of his dwelling, (2) by failing to dismiss the charges against him because they resulted from an illegal search and illegal arrest, (3) by commenting on the exercise of his right to remain silent,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Albert Douglas Davis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  5. Pistro v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Quintana v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Commonwealth v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API