Strand Amusement Company v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
Judge Willis.
It has been said that one who causes two blades of grass to grow where only one grew before is a human benefactor; but such a tribute would hardly be deserved by a decision that multiplied penal prosecutions for violation of a single statute.
I disagree with the decision of the majority on the .reversal of the judgments, and the practical importance of the question on which the reversal is rested, justifies a statement of the reasons why I think the judgments should be affirmed. . .
The appellant ran its theaters in flagrant violation of the statute. It was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re SnowSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- McAfee v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- Friedeborn v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
- Capital Theater Co. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
- Muckenfuss v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.