Legal Opinion · Dissent

Strand Amusement Company v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided November 10, 1931Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Judge Willis.

It has been said that one who causes two blades of grass to grow where only one grew before is a human benefactor; but such a tribute would hardly be deserved by a decision that multiplied penal prosecutions for violation of a single statute.

I disagree with the decision of the majority on the .reversal of the judgments, and the practical importance of the question on which the reversal is rested, justifies a statement of the reasons why I think the judgments should be affirmed. . .

The appellant ran its theaters in flagrant violation of the statute. It was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re SnowSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. McAfee v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  3. Friedeborn v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  4. Capital Theater Co. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  5. Muckenfuss v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API