Legal Opinion

In re Archibald

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided April 24, 1936No. 1171PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOLYNEAUX, District Judge.

The order to show cause requires the said farmer-debtor, Rea G. Archibald, to show cause, if any there be, before this court, why the order of this court should not be made as follows:

I. Dismissing the petition of Rea G. Archibald, debtor, as to the petitioner herein, Charles Hodous, and as to the following described land: “The South Half of the Southwest Quarter, Section 27, except 15 acres on the west end and also excepting one and one-half acres known as the saw mill tract, containing 63% acres, more or less; the Northeast Quarter and the Northeast Quarter of…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re KofoedDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1942
  2. In re N. H. Development Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1945
  3. In re HinshawDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API