Legal Opinion

Hopkins v. South Carolina Department of Social Services

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 21, 1993No. 23546PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Finney, Justice:

We granted rehearing to reconsider our original opinion which reversed the family court’s refusal to terminate respondent’s (Meyers’) parental rights to his son Michael. We now affirm.

This is a tragic case. Meyers, a Missouri resident, lived with Michael’s mother (Clark) for two months in the fall of 1983 in *324that state. Clark has lived a nomadic lifestyle and has a history of short-term serial relationships with men. In May 1984, six months after leaving Meyers, Clark called him and told him she had given birth to a child, but stated Meyers was not the father. In fact, Michael…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  2. Abercrombie v. LaBoonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  3. South Carolina Department of Social Services v. HarperCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Joiner Ex Rel. Rivas v. RivasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Hooper v. RockwellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  3. Richland County Department of Social Services v. EarlesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  4. Charleston County Department of Social Services v. KingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  5. South Carolina Department of Social Services v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API