Jackson v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
Appeal from Barbour Circuit Court. Heard before Hon. M. Sollxe. Will Jackson was convicted of violating the prohibition laws, and he appeals. There was nothing in the evidence authorizing a submission to the jury as to whether it was whisky or not that defendant received. — Jeffries v. State, 62 South. 270; Wright v. State, 5 Ala. App. 150; Oldaere v. State, 5 Ala. A'pp. 187; Glarh v. State, 64 South. 158; Jones v. State, 90 Ala. 630.
1Opinion of the CourtPelham, J.
In addition to what is said in the opinion in the case of Herring v. State, infra, 65 South. 707, present term, as to the admissibility of the evidence of the packages shipped and consigned to the defendant being billed and marked' or labeled “whisky,” it may be well in the present case to call attention to the fact, as an additional reason for admitting such evidence, that one or more of the shipments were shown, by the evidence in this case, to have been an interstate transaction, and that packages containing intoxicating liquors shipped in interstate commerce are required by the federal…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Herring v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1914
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. MinterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946