Legal Opinion

Estate of Allen v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 8, 1977No. 426-75PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kashiwa, Judge,

delivered, the opinion of the court:

This tax refund action involving a question of statutory construction concerning I.R.C. § 2037(b)1 comes before the court after the parties filed an agreed Stipulation of Facts pursuant to Rule 134(b). After briefing and oral argument, we agree with the defendant that the tables of mortality and actuarial principles as provided by the regulations under § 2037 are the exclusive method authorized to value a reversionary interest transfer taking effect at death for federal estate tax purposes. Since those regulations, at present, do not allow…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Bingler v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Bulova Watch Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Humes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
  2. Kent Robinson v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  3. Robinson v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1978
  4. Gibson v. Merck & Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022
  5. Hammler v. HernandezDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API