Legal Opinion
Douglas v. Burroughs
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided September 25, 1984No. C83-2327PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BATTISTI, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant Burrough’s demand for a jury trial under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 38(b). Co-defendant Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority (CMHA) moves to strike the jury demand on the ground that the Burroughs’ demand was untimely. For the reasons outlined below, the Court deems Burroughs’ motion timely filed and grants the jury demand.
I
Plaintiff Debra Douglas, filed a Complaint in this Court on June 2,1983, naming as Defendants Louis Burroughs, Burroughs Management Systems, Burroughs Real Estate…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Barton v. BarbourSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Simler v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kaiser Steel Corp. v. Frates (In Re Kaiser Steel Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1989
- Randolph C. Bentler v. Bank of America National Trust and Savings AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Real Property Located at 2101, 2280, 2401 & 2501 Maple StreetDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1990