Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Farrell

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 14, 1928PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorliNG, J.

Edward Farrell died .intestate, unmarried, and without issue. His’ parents were both dead. Their only issue were a daughter and intestate. (Appellant’s argument, but not the record, refers to another predeceased son.) The daughter predeceased intestate, and' left no issue. ' She left, however, a surviving husband, the appellant. The appellant claims one half of the estate, for these reasons:

• Though the mother of intestate left collateral relatives, no heirs of the father have been found. Appellant contends, in substance, that the’ father must be assumed to have outlived the intestate, and to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McAllister v. McAllisterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  2. Lawley v. KeyesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  3. Murphy v. MurphySupreme Court of Iowa · 1920

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Boyles v. CoraSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  2. In Re Estate of BradleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  3. Peet v. MongerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API