Legal Opinion

Zintsmaster v. Aiken

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1909No. 21,288PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Prom Superior Court of Allen County; O. N. Heaton, Judge. Drainage proceeding by Daniel W. Zintsmaster and others, to which James A. Aiken and others remonstrate. Prom a judgment for remonstrants, petitioners appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

This proceeding was commenced in April, 1903, by filing a petition, before the Board of Commissioners of the County of Allen, to construct a drain commencing in said county and ending in Huntington county. Said board of commissioners in January, 1906, made an order setting aside the report of the viewers made in said proceeding, for the reason that the same was “not according to law,” and dismissed said proceeding for want of prosecution. Prom this judgment the petitioners appealed to the Allen Circuit Court. The venue of the cause was changed to the Adams Circuit Court, where, on April 20,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Taylor v. StrayerIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Myers v. GibsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fast v. State ex rel. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
  2. McHale v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Holderman v. Town of North ManchesterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Buchman v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  5. Kohr v. Town of North ManchesterIndiana Supreme Court · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API