Legal Opinion

North Broward Radiologists, P.A. v. Rush

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 29, 1989No. 88-0296PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from dismissal of a complaint with prejudice. We do not attempt to second-guess the trial court as to the reasons for dismissal of the various counts of the complaint, which were based upon several different causes of action. We hold simply that the complaint did sufficiently allege a cause of action for tor-tious interference with an advantageous business relationship (see, e.g., DeRitis v. AHZ Corp., 444 So.2d 93 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)), and for breach of contract (by violating the alleged covenant not to compete). See Akey v. Murphy, 238 So.2d 94 (Fla.1970). See also…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Akey v. MurphySupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  2. DeRitis v. AHZ CORP.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. Chessick Clinic, PA v. JonesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. North Broward Radiologists, P.A. v. RushDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API