Robinson v. State

Plaintiff in error was convicted of receiving stolen goods. The evidence authorized the verdict. The grounds of the amendment of the motion for a new trial are all amplifications of the general grounds. There is no merit in any of the contentions embraced in these grounds of the motion, and we will discuss only two of them. It is insisted that the verdict is without evidence to support it because: (1) “The ownership of the goods alleged to have been received bjr defendant, knowing them to be stolen, is described in the indictment as follows: ‘ The property of Audley Hill & Company, a…