Legal Opinion

Richardson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided October 29, 2004No. CR-03-1288PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On May 12, 2003, James Earl Richardson pleaded guilty to unlawfully possessing a controlled substance (diazepam) and to unlawfully selling a controlled substance (cocaine). The trial court sentenced Richardson, as a habitual offender, to concurrent sentences of 20 years. On each conviction, the trial court suspended the sentences and placed Richardson on supervised probation for five years. As a condition of his probation, Richardson was ordered to spend nine months on "house arrest," during which time he was to wear an electronic monitoring device. Richardson was also ordered to participate…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  2. Puckett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  3. Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  4. Owens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  5. Law v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ex Parte StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  2. Ex Parte HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  3. Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  4. Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  5. Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API