Legal Opinion

in Re Carl Long

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided September 27, 2006No. 10-06-00235-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-06-00235-CV

In re Carl Long

and

No. 10-06-00239-CV

in re carl long

Original Proceedings

DISSENTING Opinion

A dismissal for want of jurisdiction is the proper result based upon the petition and “record” as filed.

The complaints are that the district clerk will not file Long’s pleadings.[1] Long alleges this is because of an oral instruction from the district judge.[2]

We have no jurisdiction to compel the district clerk to act by writ of mandamus absent extraordinary and unusual facts not present here. In re Simpson, 997 S.W.2d 939 (Tex. App.—Waco 1999, orig.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Bernard, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
  2. Long v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2004
  3. In Re Simpson, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1999
  4. Long v. Tanner, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API