Legal Opinion
Chambers v. The Moses H. Cone Mem'l Hosp.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided April 17, 2018No. COA17-686PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRYANT, Judge.
*8 Where the sole representative in a class action lacked a genuine personal interest in the outcome of the case and the unifying interests of the class was not temporary or *866 unlikely to be resolved before the claim was heard, we affirm the trial court's dismissal of the class action complaint.
On 23 August 2011, before receiving treatment for an emergency procedure at Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital (hereinafter "Moses Cone"), Christopher Chambers (hereinafter "Chambers") signed Moses Cone's Patient Consent form. The form stated "I understand that I am financially responsible for,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- City of Mesquite v. Aladdin's Castle, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Faulkenbury v. Teachers' & State Employees' Retirement SystemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
- Crow v. Citicorp Acceptance Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- Simeon v. HardinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Med. Ctr., Inc. v. BowdenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
- Chambers v. Moses H. Cone Mem'l Hosp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2020
- Chambers v. Moses H. Cone Mem'l Hosp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2020