Legal Opinion

Smith v. Cascade Laundry Company

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 9, 1960No. 23098PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHMER, Commissioner.

Appellant Lucille Smith’s claim for benefits under the Missouri Workmen’s Compensation Act was denied by the Referee, by the Industrial Commission and. by the Circuit Court. She has properly perfected an appeal.

It was admitted that on May 8, 1957, the claimant was an employee of the respondent Cascade Laundry Company; that on said date the company was an employer, operating under the provisions of the Missouri Workmen’s Compensation Law and was fully insured under said law by respondent Liberty Mutual Insurance Company.

Claimant stated that on May 6, 1957, when she…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Crow v. Missouri Implement Tractor CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  2. Marie v. Standard Steel WorksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  3. Delille v. Holton-Seelye Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  4. Vollmar v. Board of Jewish EducationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  5. Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hampton v. Big Boy Steel ErectionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  2. Davies v. Carter Carburetor, Division ACF Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  3. Brotherton v. International Shoe CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
  4. Love v. LandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
  5. Lashbrook v. Clipper Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API