Wilson v. Enfield
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtBoyce, J.
First. The amount in controversy was less than 81,000, and the county court had jurisdiction.
Second. Where a contract is not intended to express the 'entire agreement, evidence is admissible as to oral agreements as to matters on which the contract is silent; this rule applies, it is said by some of the authorities, only when the contract “on its face rebuts the presumption that it is complete.” Magnolia Warehouse & Storage Co. v. Davis & Blackwell (Tex. Civ. App.) 153 S. W. 670; Id., 108 Tex. 422, 195 S. W. 184; Gibson v. Texas Plow Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 239 S. W. 676; Guarantee Life…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Magnolia Warehouse & Storage Co. v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1917
- Sanborn v. MurphyTexas Supreme Court · 1894
- Cunningham v. Austin & Northwestern Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1895
- Welden v. Texas Continental Meat Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1886
- Old River Rice Irr. Co. v. StubbsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Richards v. CornishCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945