Legal Opinion

First Alabama Bank v. Prudential Life Ins.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 26, 1993No. 1911400, 1911401 and 1911417PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

These related appeals arise from the refusal of Prudential Life Insurance Company of America ("Prudential") to pay certain life insurance benefits to Carole B. Tindal. They are presently before this Court for the second time; for a complete history of the cases, see Badners v. Prudential Life Insurance Co.,567 So.2d 1242 (Ala. 1990).

I

(PRUDENTIAL v. TINDAL)

(Appeal)

(TINDAL v. PRUDENTIAL)

(Cross-Appeal)

Tindal, the former wife of the deceased policy holder (Thomas Badners), sued Prudential and First Alabama Bank of South Baldwin ("FAB"), alleging a breach of contract. At the end of the trial, the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Crigler v. SalacSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Broyles v. Brown Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  3. Knox Kershaw, Inc. v. KershawSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Covington v. Exxon Co., U.S.A.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Harper v. Baptist Medical Center-PrincetonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jones Food Co., Inc. v. ShipmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  2. SouthTrust Bank v. DonelySupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  3. Pannell v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  4. Citizens Bank of Moulton v. JonesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  5. MAT Systems, Inc. v. Atchison Properties, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API