Legal Opinion
F.H. Krear & Co. v. Nineteen Named Trustees
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 18, 1985No. 194, Docket 85-7206PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Per curiam
Defendants below (“Trustees”) appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Shirley Wohl Kram, Judge, entered in favor of plaintiff and third-party defendants in this breach of contract case. Because no final judgment has been entered in the district court, we dismiss the appeal.
F.H. Krear & Co. (“Krear”) brought suit to recover for the damages it claims to have suffered through defendants’ breach of three contracts with it. The Trustees subsequently served a third party complaint against Anthony Grauso, their computer consultant, for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Company v. Theda v. GiesowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Susan Gargiulo v. L. DelsoleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Union Tank Car Company v. Jakob Isbrandtsen, American Export Industries, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Johnson v. University of BridgeportCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
3Cited by27 opinions
- F.H. Krear & Co. v. Nineteen Named TrusteesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- McGuire v. Russell Miller, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Krumme v. Westpoint Stevens Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Joe E. Garcia v. Burlington Northern Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Cheek v. McGowan Elec. Supply Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1987
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.