Mellen v. Mellen
New York Supreme Court
This action was for partition. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtPatterson, J.
The conclusions at which I have arrived on this application for judgment are as follows, viz: First. The motion-to vacate the order denying the motion for a new trial made at the circuit and for a rehearing of that motion cannot be entertained. The authority to consider such a motion expired with the circuit at which the action was tried.
Second. A motion having been made at the circuit - on the judge’s minutes and denied and that court having adjourned sine die, the only way to review the verdict and the facts—as the case now stands—is by *100appeal from the order entered denying the motion..…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bell v. . MerrifieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Clark v. . MosherNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Cogswell v. . N.Y., N.H. H.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Van Rensselaer v. . Van RensselaerNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Brinckerhoff v. . BostwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.