Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Barber v. Bradley

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 2016No. 2014-SC-000424-DGPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partNoble, J.

The wife in this case raised a “gift” claim—that her husband gave her a one-half interest in the marital home. The lower courts found that he did, but either completely misconstrued this argument, or failed to require that she prove this claim by clear, and convincing evidence.

First, if the wife was claiming the property as a gift, then she was asking the court to award her half the value of the home as her separate, or nonmarital properly. That is how a “gift” must be addressed under Kentucky law. If one half of the .marital residence was truly gifted to her, then that half lost any…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fitch v. BurnsKentucky Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Browning v. BrowningCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977
  3. O'Neill v. O'NeillCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1980
  4. Kivett v. KivettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1958
  5. Rearden v. ReardenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API