Drumm-Flato Commission Co. v. Gerlack Bank
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court. — lion. Jno. W. Henry, Judge. (1) Tbe law does not require anything formal in tbe mode of giving notice in this class of eases. Notice in this class of cases is tbe equivalent of knowledge of a fact. A notice in this class of eases may be actual or it may exist where there is knowledge of such facts as put the party affected upon inquiry. 16 Am. and Eng.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court. — lion. Jno. W. Henry, Judge. (1) Tbe law does not require anything formal in tbe mode of giving notice in this class of eases. Notice in this class of cases is tbe equivalent of knowledge of a fact. A notice in this class of eases may be actual or it may exist where there is knowledge of such facts as put the party affected upon inquiry. 16 Am. and Eng. Ency. of Law, 790-792; Johnson-Brinkman Commission Company v. Bank, 116 Mo. 558; Clark v. Bank, 57 Mo. App. 277; Eyerman v. Bank, 13 Mo. App. 289, Same v. Bank, 84 Mo. 408; Nonson v. Jacob, 93 Mo. 331; Bank…
1Opinion of the CourtBroaddus, J.
This is a suit in the nature of an action for money had and received, to recover the sum of $1,371 and interest.. On the nineteenth day of October, 1899, the Globe Live Stock Commission Company, engaged in the commission business at the Kansas City Stock Yards, sold for one Randall, ninety-nine head of cattle, the net proceeds of which sale was the sum of $1,371, which was on said day deposited in the National Bank of Commerce of Kansas City by said commission company with direction to transmit the same to the defendant bank in Oklahoma Territory, to be deposited there to the credit of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gannon v. Laclede Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1898
- Johnson—Brinkman Commission Co. v. Central BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- Nanson v. JacobSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
- Butler County v. Boatmen's BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
- Eyerman v. Second National BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Drumm-Flato Commission Co. v. Gerlach BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
- Cole v. Canadian Bank of CommerceOregon Supreme Court · 1925
- Miller v. Bank of WashingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- Huff v. Oklahoma State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Kautz v. St. Louis Refrigerator Car Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.