Legal Opinion
Foxworth v. Morris
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided December 13, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
O’HERN, J.
This appeal concerns an injured person’s eligibility to receive benefits from the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund (Fund). The Fund serves as a safety net for motor-vehicle-accident victims who sustain losses or injuries caused by uninsured or unidentifiable owners or operators of motor vehicles. For an innocent passenger in a car struck by an uninsured driver the Fund will cover up to $15,000 of uninsured losses occasioned by personal injury and up to $5,000 of uninsured losses resulting from property damage. N.J.S.A. 39:6-73(c)(1) and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Merin v. MaglakiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- State v. MaguireSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Douglas v. HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Williams v. Standard Accident InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Delacruz v. Borough of HillsdaleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- Carmichael v. BryanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- REALTY ASSET PROP. v. OldhamNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002