Sheet Metal Workers International Ass'n v. Seay
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge.
This original proceeding for a writ of mandamus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (1970) and Rule 21, FRAP, challenges an order remanding a case to the State court after its removal by petitioner and the other defendants. We are persuaded that the remand order was improperly grounded on considerations not within the bounds of the removal statute, and under standards laid down by the Supreme Court in Thermtron Products, Inc. v. Hermansdorfer, 423 U.S. 336, 96 S.Ct. 584, 46 L.Ed.2d 542, we conclude that we must grant the writ.
I
Respondent Acme Engineering & Manufacturing…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Zwickler v. KootaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, Local 770Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Snapper, Inc. v. RedanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Holmstrom Ex Rel. OfficeMax v. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Flores v. LongCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Dworkin v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.District Court, D. Wyoming · 1985
- Abraham Watkins v. FesterygaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2025
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.