Legal Opinion

Fay v. Harrington

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 1, 1900PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Tort, in several counts, for libel. At the trial in the Superior Court, before Fessenden, J., the jury returned a verdict for the defendant; and the plaintiffs alleged exceptions, which appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, C. J.

This is an action for alleged libels, and has been tried twice in the Superior Court. At the first trial, after a verdict for the defendant, a bill of exceptions was allowed, which is before us. A motion for a new trial also was made, and the verdict was set aside “ as to that part of the plaintiffs’ claim which relates to injury from plaintiffs being brought into public hatred and contempt,” and a new trial was ordered upon the condition that the plaintiffs should claim only on that ground. A second trial was had, which resulted in a second verdict for the defendant, and at this trial a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burt v. Advertiser Newspaper Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  2. Twombly v. MonroeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  3. JanvrinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  4. McMahon v. McHaleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Triggs v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. Hubbard v. AllynMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  3. Ingalls v. Hastings & Sons Publishing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. Muchnick v. Post Publishing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
  5. Finnish Temperance Society Sovittaja v. Finnish Socialistic Publishing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API