Legal Opinion
De Met v. Zeman
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided June 24, 1971No. 6235Published
1Opinion of the Court
*295OPINION
By the Court,
Gunderson, J.:
Respondents, a firm of accountants, obtained the following judgment against appellant Peter De Met and others:
“ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the plaintiffs recover judgment against PETER De MET, LOUIS LARAMORE, HAROLD V. CLARK and J. A. DONNELLEY, as Executors of the Estate of WILBUR I. CLARK, deceased, a partnership, d/b/a C. D. L., NEVADA, and PETER De MET, individually, in the sum of $52,516.16, interest in the sum of $15,483.64, and costs taxed in the amount of $304.65.”
The evidence does not support the judgment, under any construction of such…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Checker, Incorporated v. ZemanNevada Supreme Court · 1970
- Flannery v. AndersonNevada Supreme Court · 1868
- Carvalho v. McCoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Howard's EstateNevada Supreme Court · 1924
- Dome v. MaggardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1954