Legal Opinion

De Met v. Zeman

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1971No. 6235Published

1Opinion of the Court

*295OPINION

By the Court,

Gunderson, J.:

Respondents, a firm of accountants, obtained the following judgment against appellant Peter De Met and others:

“ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the plaintiffs recover judgment against PETER De MET, LOUIS LARAMORE, HAROLD V. CLARK and J. A. DONNELLEY, as Executors of the Estate of WILBUR I. CLARK, deceased, a partnership, d/b/a C. D. L., NEVADA, and PETER De MET, individually, in the sum of $52,516.16, interest in the sum of $15,483.64, and costs taxed in the amount of $304.65.”

The evidence does not support the judgment, under any construction of such…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Checker, Incorporated v. ZemanNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Flannery v. AndersonNevada Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Carvalho v. McCoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Howard's EstateNevada Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Dome v. MaggardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API