Legal Opinion

Seabaugh v. Keele

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 1989No. 54839PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARL R. GAERTNER, Judge.

Plaintiffs William and Dorothy Seabaugh instituted this action against defendants, Billy and Sara Keele, seeking specific performance of a contract for the purchase of real estate in Count I and damages allegedly sustained by plaintiffs as a result of defendants’ breach of that contract in Count II. The case was tried without a jury and the trial court, with detailed findings of fact and conclusions of law, held plaintiffs were entitled to retain the earnest money deposit as liquidated damages but denied plaintiffs’ prayer for an order of specific performance.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Orchard Container Corp. v. OrchardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Weber v. KnackstedtMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Payne v. PayneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Ferguson v. KindleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  5. Germany v. NelsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Holtmeier v. DayaniMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Kopp v. FranksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Asbury v. Crawford Electric Cooperative, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Safeco Ins. Co. v. LAKE ASPHALT PAVING & CONST.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2011
  5. THOMAS J. BROWN, III, Trustee of Thomas J. Brown, III, Revocable Trust U/A/D May 13, 2021 v. DARREN and DAPHNE JERNIGANMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API