Legal Opinion

Citibank, N. A. v. Grunfeld

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 2001Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Gloria Cohen Aronin, J.

Plaintiffs motion in this foreclosure action for a judgment of foreclosure and sale and a confirmation of the Referee’s report dated October 26, 2000, which calculated the balance due in the sum of $241,837.97, with interest, is granted. The cross motion by the Grunfeld defendants to vacate the aforementioned Referee’s report and have this matter referred to a different Referee is denied.

*328In a memorandum decision dated April 7, 2000 and entered April 12, 2000, plaintiffs motion for summary judgment was granted and the Grunfeld defendants’ (defendants)…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Staatsburg Water Co. v. Staatsburg Fire DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Union Chelsea National Bank v. Rumican 190 Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Haque v. PocchiaAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API