Legal Opinion

MacKe Laundry Service Ltd. Partnership v. Mission Associates, Ltd.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided May 6, 1994No. 69,588PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Green, J.:

This appeal involves a tortious interference with a contractual expectancy claim brought by Macke Laundry Service Limited Partnership (Macke). Macke contends Jetz Service Company, Inc., (Jetz) tortiously interfered with its contractual expectancy with Mission Associates, Ltd., d/b/a Heritage Hills Apartments (Heritage Hills). Originally, Macke’s action included a claim against Heritage Hills for breach of contract; however, this claim was stayed as a result of Heritage Hills’ bankruptcy. The jury found in favor of Macke, and the trial court entered judgment accordingly. Jetz…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Turner v. Halliburton Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  2. Barbara Oil Co. v. Kansas Gas Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  3. Simon v. National Farmers Organization, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  4. Finstad v. Washburn UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  5. Wood River Pipeline Co. v. Willbros Energy Services Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1987

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. MacKe Laundry Service Ltd. Partnership v. Jetz Service Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Diederich v. YarnevichCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
  3. DP-Tek, Inc. v. AT & T Global Information Solutions Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995
  4. Meyer Land & Cattle Co. v. Lincoln County Conservation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2001
  5. Triple-I Corp. v. Hudson Associates Consulting, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API