Legal Opinion

Halstead v. Windsor

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 17, 1995No. 1921172PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

C.F. Halstead appeals from the trial court's judgment in favor of H. Jack Windsor in an action to quiet title.

On October 11, 1982, C.F. Halstead entered into an installment sales contract or "bond for title" to sell property to Lewis Wainwright.1 Under the agreement, Halstead agreed to convey the property to Wainwright upon payment of the purchase price in full. In the event of default, Halstead would have the right to annul the agreement, Wainwright would become Halstead's tenant, and any money paid in the interim would be retained by Halstead as rent. The agreement did not provide that time…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ashurst v. PeckSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  2. Loventhal v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  3. Beasley v. Mellon Financial Services Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  4. Lowery v. PetersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  5. Gay v. TompkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wilder Corp. v. WilkeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  2. Taunton v. Reding (In Re Taunton)District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2004
  3. Capitol Const. v. Alabama Exterior SupplyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  4. Rogers v. Triple S Ventures, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API