Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Cantrall
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 20, 1953No. 13356_1PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Circuit Judge.
After proceedings duly had pursuant to statutory authority, the National Labor Relations Board, hereafter referred to as the Board, ordered respondents J. R. Cantrall Company and H. C. Smith Company to cease and desist from certain unfair labor-practices and to take certain affirmative action. The Board is asking us for enforcement.
The order is predicated upon a finding-of the Board that respondents were engaged in commerce within the meaning of’ the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, hereafter called the Act, and found' a violation of § 8(a) (1) and (3) thereof, in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- North Whittier Heights Citrus Ass'n v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- National Labor Relations Board v. National Maritime Union of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- International Union, United Mine Workers of America v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- National Labor Relations Board v. Holtville Ice & Cold Storage Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
- National Labor Relations Board v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
3Cited by12 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. W. B. Jones Lumber Company, Inc., and Lumber and Sawmill Workers' Union, Local 2288, AFLCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- National Labor Relations Board v. SwinertonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- National Labor Relations Board v. Lummus Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- Eichleay Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- National Labor Relations Board v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.