Legal Opinion
State v. Cusimano
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided April 26, 1937No. 34057PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Justice.
The State of' Louisiana, through its supervisor of public accounts sued Frank J. Cusimano for the balance due on a license which he procured for engaging in the business described in section 1 (a) of Act No. 24 of the Third Extra Session of 1935. Defendant made no denial of the facts alleged by the plaintiff. His only defense to’ the Suit was that Act No. 24 of the Third Extra Session of 1935, on which it is predicated, is unconstitutional. The court below overruled the plea of unconstitutionality and on the merits rendered judgment for plaintiff. From that judgment defendant…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lionel's Cigar Store v. McFarlandSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
- State v. DalonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
- Excelsior Planting & Manufacturing Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1887
- State Ex Rel. Porterie v. H. L. Hunt, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
- State ex rel. Sewerage & Water Board v. MichelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Board of Comm'rs. of Port of New Orleans v. Splendour S. & E. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
- Swift v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
- Louisiana State Department of Agriculture v. SibilleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
- Mississippi River Fuel Corporation v. Roland Cocreham, Collector of Revenue of the State of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- State Ex Rel. Grosch v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1947
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.