Jackson v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Butler Circuit Court. — Hon. R. P. Oaten, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtHough, C. J.
1. review able bb-B0KS. No exception to the action of the court in overruling tlie motion for a new trial was saved in the of exceptions, and we are, therefore, limited to an examination of alleged errors in the record proper. Wilson v. Haxby, 76 Mo. 345; State ex rel. Estes v. Gaither, 77 Mo. 304.
2. bailboads: kill-lug live stock :suffi-eiencyoicomplaint
The only question arising upon the record proper is as to the sufficiency, after verdict, of the following statement: “Plaintiff states defendant is a corporation _ . . „ , h under the laws ot the btate of Missouri; that on the 20th day of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Edwards v. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
- Nance v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- State ex rel. Estes v. GaitherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- Bates v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1881
- Wilson v. HaxbySupreme Court of Missouri · 1882
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Busby v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- Moore v. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1884
- Slaughter v. SlaughterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
- Rudd v. RuddMissouri Court of Appeals · 1929
- Morrow v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1884
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.