Legal Opinion

Montana Ore Purchasing Co. v. Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1906No. 2,198PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Silver Bow County; William Clancy, Judge. From an order taxing the costs of an appeal, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Brantly

On appeal to this court from a judgment in favor of plaintiff and an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial, the order was affirmed, but the judgment was modified and the defendant was permitted to recover one-half of the costs of the appeals. (Montana Ore Pur. Co. v. Boston & Montana Con. etc. Min. Co., 27 Mont. 288, 70 Pac. 1114, 27 Mont. 536, 71 Pac. 1005.) Within thirty days after remittitur went down, the defendant filed with the .clerk of the district court its verified memorandum of costs. 0 The plaintiff then moved that court to tax the bill by striking out each item…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Montana Ore Purchasing Co. v. Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Montana Ore Purchasing Co. v. Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Ryan v. MaxeyMontana Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Broberg v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Nelson v. Montana Iron Mining CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Anderson v. HinmanMontana Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Sullivan v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1950
  5. State ex rel. Connors v. FosterMontana Supreme Court · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API