Legal Opinion
Edick v. Poznanski
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided February 24, 1998No. 5:97 CV 52PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ENSLEN, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant Poznanski’s Motion to Dismiss, filed July 3, 1997 (Dkt.# 17), pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). Defendant claims that this Court lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter because Defendant is not of diverse citizenship from Plaintiff. For the following reasons, Defendant’s motion is granted.
FACTS
On April 15, 1997, Plaintiff filed a complaint in this Court against Defendant alleging conspiracy to intentionally inflict emotional distress, defamation, and abuse of process.. Plaintiff alleged jurisdiction…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-LarrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- The Ohio National Life Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Carol L. Kirchner GAFFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jennifer Mason v. Lockwood, Andrews & NewnamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Hyundai Motor America v. Tennessee Motor Vehicle CommissionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2016
- Jennifer Mason v. Lockwood, Andrews & NewnamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Kendall v. DeLongDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2020
- Smith v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021