Legal Opinion

Richards v. Richards & Richards

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided February 24, 1983No. 82CA0391PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERMAN, Judge.

Petitioner seeks review of an award of dependent’s benefits made to her under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. We set aside the award.

Petitioner’s husband, a uranium miner, was diagnosed as suffering from lung cancer. In 1978, the Industrial Commission, in a ruling which is not contested by this petition, awarded temporary disability benefits.

Two years later, petitioner’s husband died as a result of the cancer. Petitioner applied for, and was awarded, dependent’s benefits. These benefits were computed based on the maximum death benefit in effect at the time of decedent’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rosander v. Copco Steel & Engineering Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Claim of Dick v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  3. of Hampton v. Director of Division of LaborColorado Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Matter of FossumOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Colorado Fuel & Iron Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hirneisen v. Champlain Cable Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  2. Ward v. WardColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Survivors of Young v. Island Feeling, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API