Legal Opinion

McCarron v. Upper Peninsula Hauling Ass'n

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 30, 1968No. Docket No. 2,471PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.

At the close of plaintiffs’ proofs in this nonjury negligence action, the trial judge granted defendants’ motions for directed verdict on the basis no negligence had been shown. Properly, these should have been motions to dismiss under GCR 1963, 504.2, and we so treat them.

Pursuant to the requirements of GCR 1963, 504.2, the trial judge made the findings required by GCR 1963, 517.1. A review of the trial record does not persuade us that such findings are clearly erroneous.

Affirmed, with costs to defendants.

McIntyre, J., concurred with Quinn, J.

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Merritt v. NickelsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Dauer v. ZabelMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Jamens v. Shelby TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Bradley v. O'BrienMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Jamens v. Shelby TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API