Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Marshall
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided July 24, 2007No. Civil Action 99-11837-WGYPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
YOUNG, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Petitioner David Jackson (“Jackson”) brings this petition asking the Court to reconsider its judgment denying an evi-dentiary hearing on a claim made pursuant to a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Pet.’s Mot. for Recons, of Order [Doc. No. 68]. This request requires that this Court travel through the treacherous intersection between statutory habeas law, federal civil procedure, and the common law of appeals from criminal sentences. This Court must look to the judgments of the Massachusetts courts, a most distinguished former…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Bracy v. GramleySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Blufford Hayes, Jr. v. Jill Brown, Warden of the California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jackson v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- Velazquez-Rivera v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2014
- Jackson v. MarshallDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- Miguelangel G. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2026