Legal Opinion

In re Arrow Transportation Co. of Delaware

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon

Decided August 6, 1998No. Bankruptcy No. 397-34556PSH11PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

POLLY S. HIGDON, Chief Judge.

This matter came before the court on the Debtor-in-Possession’s objection to a proof of claim 'filed by the Oregon Department of Transportation. (The “Department”). The Department filed a claim for $82,446.71 of which $75,326.38, which is based on charges imposed under Oregon Revised Statutes (“ORS”) 825.474-476 (formerly codified under ORS 767.815-820), it believes is an excise tax and thus holds priority status under § 507(a)(8)(E).1 The debtor-in-possession objects only to the classification of the $75,326.38 as priority. It contends that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Suburban Motor Freight, Inc., Debtor. Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation v. Stephen K. Yoder, Trustee for Suburban Motor Freight, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  2. In Re Suburban Motor Freight, Inc., Debtor. Stephen K. Yoder, Trustee v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  3. In Re Karen Lee Camilli, Debtor. Industrial Commission of Arizona v. Karen Lee CamilliCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  4. Oregon v. Robert K. Morrow, Inc. (In Re Belozer Farms, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Oregon, Department of Transportation v. Arrow Transportation Co. of Delaware (In Re Arrow Transportation Co. of Delaware)District Court, D. Oregon · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API