Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Anna M. Rafferty v. Office of Personnel Management

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided May 18, 2005No. 04-3323Published

1ConcurrenceProst, Circuit Judge

The majority recognizes but declines to resolve the inconsistency between our interpretation of 5 U.S.C. § 8341(h) in Vaccaro v. Office of Personnel Management, 262 F.3d 1280 (Fed.Cir.2001), and the Office of Personnel Management’s (“OPM’s”) regulations purporting to carry out the same statutory subsection, saying the question “remains for another day.” Ante, at 1324. Nevertheless, the majority applies Vaccaro’s interpretation of the statute and finds that Ms. Rafferty is not entitled to a survivor annuity. Ante, at 1323. I believe, however, that today is the day to resolve the inconsistency:…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Constance Berry Newman, Director, Office of Personnel Management v. Lois G. Love and Esther E. Penn, and Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  2. Linda L. Vaccaro v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API